http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13509704/

All I can say is WOW. Poor guy. And yeah, flame if you must but I couldn't not laugh when I first read it. Then I thought more about it and really POOR GUY, because no amount of cash will make him feel better, I don't think.

Well if he just of would have put it to use he would not be a recluse now. Jeesh! I'm just kidding though and I hope he finds some kind of peace with himself.

I mean... geez, there are some, huh, practical things to consider, like.... does he have to get into a handstand, to pee??? Sorry if that's crude but what the hell can he do?

Well, it's not like he can't have it REMOVED!!! SHeesh! I don't think I'd have waited 10 years to do that! Seems like a pretty simple and practical solution.

Lynn

According to his lawyer as quoted in the NYPost, he has serious health issues which make surgery impossible. Go figure.

You could have titled this thread, "BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR".

Egad. The poor guy.

One word, "Ouch"!

Hehe, that's true... ;D

Ya know, when you're 58 (as he was in 1996), you should be thinking of something else besides your d***, IMHO. All this E.D. obsession is nonsense. Nature didn't intend us to shag like newts decades after the childbearing years, I am sure of it.

We-ell, I don't know how old you are, rasputin, but I don't know that those of us who've hit 50 are quite ready to pack it in just yet. I understand his motivation. On the other hand, I don't have one, but the idea of having something stuck in one's d*** gives me the willies. So to speak, for our British friends. I'd take a pill any day.

Agreed, I mean who wants to accept that?
Because if you go by the number of middle aged or even older men who keep partying around, whether or not they're past their sexual peak or childbearing years, they sure aren't ready to give up the fun.
And why should they?
Given the punishing rat race that life has become in today's society, everyone regardless of their age should be able to enjoy a good romp at the end of the day.
So, pants down and bottoms up, I say!

And there can be something quite liberating about sex after the childbearing years. Just for fun, without the concerns either way regarding conception. Also, there can be a lot more acceptance of infirmities or defects in appearance.

Bring it on!

I'm afraid I'm an embittered, Frannie Lebowitz-style curmudgeon. Sex is for those with fairly pretty bodies. I don't want to git nekkid in front of anybody anymore.

(Hurl stones now!!!!!!)

Yes, definitely. Who said there was nothing to look forward to after 50? Hehe.




Sorry but that's absurd. Sex is for anyone who wants it, has the health and the partner for it.

Who wants to bet that after he got the $$$ that "thing" got removed pronto!

Well, I hope so. Mind you , Handy when going supermarket shopping with all the bags though.

okay so the guy has health problems now (10 hears after he got it) but what about right after he got it. it would have been obvious that something wasn't working right. I bet his health was better than.

ROFL!

I'm trying to say this kindly, but why not get over yourself? (Guess I didn't manage it, lol.) There's fun to be had--as well as the emotional connection. If your own standards are not unattainable, I'm sure you'd find a lot of acceptance out there (and my guess is that you probably look pretty good anyway).

Eeeeeek!!! Wonder what he wears to hide it?

I agree with Bonski (as usual). If it's been malfunctioning all these years, and his health was adequate to implant it in the first place, he could have gone right back and had it taken care of right away. His waiting around for years and years to get checked and then file a lawsuit seems very irresponsible on his "part"!

P.S. Another vote here in favor of sexual activity at any age.

Why DID he wait so long to complain?

Didn't he notice the problem soon after he got the implant?

Well, I believe the article said that in addition to his health being too fragile for surgery, that there was not enough tissue left in his ###### (I KNOW that word is going to show up as hatchmarks when this post posts! Damned censors!) :) Penile member. Unit. Package. Rod. What word IS acceptable when the dictionary term for that anatomical part is not?? Hmph.

So, anyway, as I was saying....I believe they were saying it was kind of a hollow tube now with no real means of support. Frankly, the whole thing gives me the willies.....pardon the pun.

PS - I, too, am in favor of sex at any age for anyone who is willing and able to engage. Just don't tell me the details, ok?

I believe the acceptable term is "winkie."

LOL!!! Wanna see how many terms we can post that the censor software won't notice??

-Peewee
-Noodle
-Mr. Happy
-Mr. Droopy
-The brain neutralizer
-Dude Where's My Viagra
-Le Zizi (French speakers will apreciate this one...)
-La quequette (Another REALLY goofy one from France)
-La zezette (you get the point... hehe)
-La bite (Ok that one is EXTREMELY rude. Pronounced BEET)

YOUR TURN!

You can go literary and call it John Thomas (from Lady Chatterley's Lover), or low culture and you've got the younger son in the Cleaver household. Delicacy prevents me from typing his name. Wouldn't want to get slapped! (And what were they thinking?!)

The tread could have the tittle :

"Is this your gun or you`re happy to see me?"


...anyway this man must be really suffering ... Can you imagine that his "birdy"goes anywhere before him?

... And to think that John Wayne Bobitt (sp?) probably envies him...

Mr. DroopyHead
Brains Below
Family Jewels
Little Willie
Big Kahuna

Those are a few I've used...

Who's your fireman
Swingin' peanut
Hulk on Viagra
Fallen and can't get up
Mr. Big
Stuart Little
The science project
Elephant man




...................... huh, yes: I have a past. ;D

Tally Wagger maybe?